<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 449 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103588</link>
    <description>Refund of unallotted share application money attracted interest from expiry of the stipulated ten-week refund period, because the company remained in possession of the amount beyond that period and the delay in RBI permission did not displace the refund obligation. The complainant was therefore entitled to interest up to the date the refund order was prepared and acted upon. Where the refund cheque was made payable at a place other than the local branch, causing avoidable bank collection charges, reimbursement was also allowed as part of proper refund practice. The remaining relief was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:18:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 449 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103588</link>
      <description>Refund of unallotted share application money attracted interest from expiry of the stipulated ten-week refund period, because the company remained in possession of the amount beyond that period and the delay in RBI permission did not displace the refund obligation. The complainant was therefore entitled to interest up to the date the refund order was prepared and acted upon. Where the refund cheque was made payable at a place other than the local branch, causing avoidable bank collection charges, reimbursement was also allowed as part of proper refund practice. The remaining relief was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>