<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 406 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103581</link>
    <description>Where winding up has commenced, a secured creditor cannot unilaterally sell the company&#039;s assets without leave of the Company Court, because the court&#039;s custody over the property and the pari passu rights of workmen under the Companies Act, 1956 must be respected; a sale made without such leave is void. The sick industrial company regime did not displace this requirement, as the two statutes were read harmoniously and the special Act&#039;s sale powers could not be used in derogation of the Company Court&#039;s control during winding up. The operative effect is that any sale of assets in this situation must conform to the workmen&#039;s charge and obtain court approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 18:02:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 406 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103581</link>
      <description>Where winding up has commenced, a secured creditor cannot unilaterally sell the company&#039;s assets without leave of the Company Court, because the court&#039;s custody over the property and the pari passu rights of workmen under the Companies Act, 1956 must be respected; a sale made without such leave is void. The sick industrial company regime did not displace this requirement, as the two statutes were read harmoniously and the special Act&#039;s sale powers could not be used in derogation of the Company Court&#039;s control during winding up. The operative effect is that any sale of assets in this situation must conform to the workmen&#039;s charge and obtain court approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>