https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103579 The Court ordered the winding up of the respondent-company under sections 433, 434, and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to its failure to pay its dues, despite the lack of opposition to the petition and the unsustainability of the company's defense. The Official Liquidator was appointed to take control of the company's assets and affairs, with notices for winding up to be published in specified newspapers. The judgment was delivered on May 20, 1998, by Swatanter Kumar, J. en-us Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:56:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103579 The Court ordered the winding up of the respondent-company under sections 433, 434, and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to its failure to pay its dues, despite the lack of opposition to the petition and the unsustainability of the company's defense. The Official Liquidator was appointed to take control of the company's assets and affairs, with notices for winding up to be published in specified newspapers. The judgment was delivered on May 20, 1998, by Swatanter Kumar, J. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 21 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103579