<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 315 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103569</link>
    <description>Exemption notifications under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 were held to cover synthetic gems, so the purchases and sales of those goods were not taxable. The SC agreed with the High Court that, where the applicable section 10 notification includes the goods in question, sales tax cannot be levied on the related transactions. The assessee therefore retained the benefit of exemption and the tax liability was negatived.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2013 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 315 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103569</link>
      <description>Exemption notifications under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 were held to cover synthetic gems, so the purchases and sales of those goods were not taxable. The SC agreed with the High Court that, where the applicable section 10 notification includes the goods in question, sales tax cannot be levied on the related transactions. The assessee therefore retained the benefit of exemption and the tax liability was negatived.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>