<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (1) TMI 393 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103568</link>
    <description>A statutory tribunal under the 1993 Act was treated as lacking jurisdiction to grant wide ex parte ad interim injunctions and ancillary reliefs before hearing the affected party, because the Act and Procedure Rules were read as providing only limited interim power and no implied authority for broader relief. The impugned orders were also found unsustainable because they were mechanical, reasoned in stereotyped terms, and passed without adequate notice or case-specific application of mind. Orders affecting civil rights and business operations must comply with natural justice, including notice, hearing and reasons; prejudice from denial of notice was treated as inherent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (1) TMI 393 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103568</link>
      <description>A statutory tribunal under the 1993 Act was treated as lacking jurisdiction to grant wide ex parte ad interim injunctions and ancillary reliefs before hearing the affected party, because the Act and Procedure Rules were read as providing only limited interim power and no implied authority for broader relief. The impugned orders were also found unsustainable because they were mechanical, reasoned in stereotyped terms, and passed without adequate notice or case-specific application of mind. Orders affecting civil rights and business operations must comply with natural justice, including notice, hearing and reasons; prejudice from denial of notice was treated as inherent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>