<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (12) TMI 520 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103566</link>
    <description>A stock exchange membership card was treated as a contractual personal privilege, not a transferable property right. The exchange rules providing for cessation of nomination rights on default, vesting of proceeds in the exchange, priority payment of exchange and clearing house dues, and a first and paramount lien on the member&#039;s security were held fair, reasonable, and consistent with the regulatory scheme protecting market integrity and creditor interests. The Court also held that a writ could not be issued to compel amendment, alteration, or deletion of the rules, because such directions would amount to legislative action beyond judicial power.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (12) TMI 520 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103566</link>
      <description>A stock exchange membership card was treated as a contractual personal privilege, not a transferable property right. The exchange rules providing for cessation of nomination rights on default, vesting of proceeds in the exchange, priority payment of exchange and clearing house dues, and a first and paramount lien on the member&#039;s security were held fair, reasonable, and consistent with the regulatory scheme protecting market integrity and creditor interests. The Court also held that a writ could not be issued to compel amendment, alteration, or deletion of the rules, because such directions would amount to legislative action beyond judicial power.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>