https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103565 An application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) may be examined even after issues are framed and the suit is listed for evidence, because the court must test the plaint on its own averments and can terminate a suit that discloses no sustainable cause of action. In disputes under irrevocable letters of credit, the bank's payment obligation remains independent of the underlying transaction, subject only to narrow fraud exceptions. A bare plea that goods were not supplied does not establish fraud, and absent specific allegations of forged or fraudulent documents, the plaint does not disclose a legally cognizable cause of action against the seller. The plaint was therefore rejected as against the appellant. en-us Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103565 An application for rejection of plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) may be examined even after issues are framed and the suit is listed for evidence, because the court must test the plaint on its own averments and can terminate a suit that discloses no sustainable cause of action. In disputes under irrevocable letters of credit, the bank's payment obligation remains independent of the underlying transaction, subject only to narrow fraud exceptions. A bare plea that goods were not supplied does not establish fraud, and absent specific allegations of forged or fraudulent documents, the plaint does not disclose a legally cognizable cause of action against the seller. The plaint was therefore rejected as against the appellant. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 19 Dec 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103565