<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 306 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103557</link>
    <description>An exemption under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act for sale of newsprint manufactured in the State for two years from commencement of production was treated as a general exemption for section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Explanation to section 8(2-A) excludes only exemptions that operate in specified circumstances or under specified conditions, but an exemption that merely identifies the goods and the dealer by reference to the factory&#039;s production period does not, by itself, become a conditional exemption. Relying on Pine Chemicals Ltd., the analysis states that the relevant inquiry is whether the exemption attaches to the sale transaction itself; here it did not, so the corresponding inter-State sales were exempt from Central sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 306 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103557</link>
      <description>An exemption under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act for sale of newsprint manufactured in the State for two years from commencement of production was treated as a general exemption for section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act. The Explanation to section 8(2-A) excludes only exemptions that operate in specified circumstances or under specified conditions, but an exemption that merely identifies the goods and the dealer by reference to the factory&#039;s production period does not, by itself, become a conditional exemption. Relying on Pine Chemicals Ltd., the analysis states that the relevant inquiry is whether the exemption attaches to the sale transaction itself; here it did not, so the corresponding inter-State sales were exempt from Central sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>