https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103554 A company's amalgamation did not terminate criminal proceedings under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956; pending prosecution could continue through the transferee company with the court's permission, and the later sale of the flat did not erase liability because the relevant conduct was assessed at the time of alleged wrongful withholding. An imperfectly described vakalatnama, without more, did not establish forgery or fabrication under the Indian Penal Code, 1860; at most it could be rejected as defective. The charge was sustained, the revision failed, and the successor company was left to seek formal continuation of the prosecution. en-us Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:29:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103554 A company's amalgamation did not terminate criminal proceedings under section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956; pending prosecution could continue through the transferee company with the court's permission, and the later sale of the flat did not erase liability because the relevant conduct was assessed at the time of alleged wrongful withholding. An imperfectly described vakalatnama, without more, did not establish forgery or fabrication under the Indian Penal Code, 1860; at most it could be rejected as defective. The charge was sustained, the revision failed, and the successor company was left to seek formal continuation of the prosecution. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 15 Nov 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103554