https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103535 The court emphasized the necessity of recording reasons for granting injunctions without notice, highlighting that failure to do so violates procedural requirements. It was held that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit due to the location of the parties and cause of action, leading to the orders granting interim injunctions being set aside. Allegations of fraud by the revision petitioners were dismissed, with the court stating that the disputed facts did not impact the validity of the interim orders. The revision petitions were allowed, and the orders passed by the District Munsif were set aside. en-us Fri, 21 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:23:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103535 The court emphasized the necessity of recording reasons for granting injunctions without notice, highlighting that failure to do so violates procedural requirements. It was held that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit due to the location of the parties and cause of action, leading to the orders granting interim injunctions being set aside. Allegations of fraud by the revision petitioners were dismissed, with the court stating that the disputed facts did not impact the validity of the interim orders. The revision petitions were allowed, and the orders passed by the District Munsif were set aside. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103535