<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 779 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103512</link>
    <description>Capital goods credit under Rule 57Q was available for electrical items, including APFC relays, panels, control panels and enamelled winding wire, where they supplied electricity to machinery used in manufacture. The relevant test was a direct functional nexus with manufacturing machinery: items recognised by precedent as components or accessories serving the manufacturing process qualified as capital goods. Applying this principle, the disputed electrical equipment was eligible for credit and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:33:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 779 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103512</link>
      <description>Capital goods credit under Rule 57Q was available for electrical items, including APFC relays, panels, control panels and enamelled winding wire, where they supplied electricity to machinery used in manufacture. The relevant test was a direct functional nexus with manufacturing machinery: items recognised by precedent as components or accessories serving the manufacturing process qualified as capital goods. Applying this principle, the disputed electrical equipment was eligible for credit and the Revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>