<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (3) TMI 330 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103511</link>
    <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled in an application under section 529(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 that secured creditors, Bank of India and the A.P. Industrial Development Corporation (APIDC), are liable to pay watch and ward staff salaries and arrears. The court determined a 2:5 ratio for the payment of salaries between the bank and APIDC. The court held that both secured creditors must share the burden until APIDC decides to relinquish its security. The judgment clarified that APIDC could seek exemption from liability by opting out of the winding-up proceedings. The court directed payments to be made accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:31:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (3) TMI 330 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103511</link>
      <description>The High Court of Andhra Pradesh ruled in an application under section 529(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 that secured creditors, Bank of India and the A.P. Industrial Development Corporation (APIDC), are liable to pay watch and ward staff salaries and arrears. The court determined a 2:5 ratio for the payment of salaries between the bank and APIDC. The court held that both secured creditors must share the burden until APIDC decides to relinquish its security. The judgment clarified that APIDC could seek exemption from liability by opting out of the winding-up proceedings. The court directed payments to be made accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>