<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 303 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103482</link>
    <description>Service by affixation in company court proceedings is not invalid merely because no witness attested the affixation, where the governing rules are silent and no express order requires such attestation. The Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 remain the primary framework for company court procedure, and the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies only where those rules are silent so far as applicable. The High Court&#039;s Original Side Rules do not automatically govern company court matters. Affixation at the respondent&#039;s last known address was therefore treated as proper and valid, and the earlier view treating such service as invalid was reversed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 303 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103482</link>
      <description>Service by affixation in company court proceedings is not invalid merely because no witness attested the affixation, where the governing rules are silent and no express order requires such attestation. The Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 remain the primary framework for company court procedure, and the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 applies only where those rules are silent so far as applicable. The High Court&#039;s Original Side Rules do not automatically govern company court matters. Affixation at the respondent&#039;s last known address was therefore treated as proper and valid, and the earlier view treating such service as invalid was reversed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>