https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103480 Article 101(1) permitted Central Government directions only regarding the council's exercise and performance of functions involving national public interest; it did not authorise control over staff, service conditions, or internal management. The executive committee retained authority under the articles to administer general affairs, appoint and control employees, and regulate service conditions and discipline. Any transfer or alteration of those powers required amendment of the articles under the Companies Act, rather than executive directions. Directions assuming staff control therefore constituted unauthorised and arbitrary interference with the executive committee's powers and were invalid. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:10:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103480 Article 101(1) permitted Central Government directions only regarding the council's exercise and performance of functions involving national public interest; it did not authorise control over staff, service conditions, or internal management. The executive committee retained authority under the articles to administer general affairs, appoint and control employees, and regulate service conditions and discipline. Any transfer or alteration of those powers required amendment of the articles under the Companies Act, rather than executive directions. Directions assuming staff control therefore constituted unauthorised and arbitrary interference with the executive committee's powers and were invalid. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Aug 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103480