<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 980 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103458</link>
    <description>Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed merely because interest-free advances were made to a sister concern where no nexus is established between borrowed funds and the advance. Sufficient interest-free funds exceeding the amount advanced support the conclusion that no proportionate disallowance of interest is justified. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to deletion of the interest disallowance failed; the tax effect was also below the applicable CBDT monetary limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:39:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 980 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103458</link>
      <description>Interest expenditure cannot be disallowed merely because interest-free advances were made to a sister concern where no nexus is established between borrowed funds and the advance. Sufficient interest-free funds exceeding the amount advanced support the conclusion that no proportionate disallowance of interest is justified. The Revenue&#039;s challenge to deletion of the interest disallowance failed; the tax effect was also below the applicable CBDT monetary limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>