<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (7) TMI 531 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103438</link>
    <description>Amounts retained or appropriated to meet known liabilities are treated as provisions, not reserves, for statutory capital computation. A debenture redemption reserve set apart for repayment of debentures was held to be a provision because the borrowing creates a known liability, so it is excluded from capital under the relevant surtax computation rules. By the same principle, a gratuity reserve set aside for future but already known gratuity liability is also characterised as a provision rather than a reserve. The governing test is the nature of the amount retained, not its label or whether the liability falls due later.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (7) TMI 531 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103438</link>
      <description>Amounts retained or appropriated to meet known liabilities are treated as provisions, not reserves, for statutory capital computation. A debenture redemption reserve set apart for repayment of debentures was held to be a provision because the borrowing creates a known liability, so it is excluded from capital under the relevant surtax computation rules. By the same principle, a gratuity reserve set aside for future but already known gratuity liability is also characterised as a provision rather than a reserve. The governing test is the nature of the amount retained, not its label or whether the liability falls due later.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>