<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 355 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103426</link>
    <description>Service of notice under the repealed Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 was considered an academic issue because that regime had been replaced by the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, which adopted a different requirement of affording the dealer a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The Court declined to decide whether notice served on an employee or manager was valid or whether such service was a condition precedent to jurisdiction under the 1953 Act, because any ruling would have no general importance under the superseded statute. The appeals were dismissed without expression of opinion on the notice question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 355 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103426</link>
      <description>Service of notice under the repealed Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 was considered an academic issue because that regime had been replaced by the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, which adopted a different requirement of affording the dealer a reasonable opportunity of being heard. The Court declined to decide whether notice served on an employee or manager was valid or whether such service was a condition precedent to jurisdiction under the 1953 Act, because any ruling would have no general importance under the superseded statute. The appeals were dismissed without expression of opinion on the notice question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>