<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 527 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all grounds, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions of undisclosed income unjustified due to lack of evidence linking the amounts to undisclosed income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of valid searches and evidence for making additions during block assessments, ultimately deleting all contested additions and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 527 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on all grounds, finding the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions of undisclosed income unjustified due to lack of evidence linking the amounts to undisclosed income. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of valid searches and evidence for making additions during block assessments, ultimately deleting all contested additions and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>