<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 957 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103414</link>
    <description>A surrender of additional income during assessment proceedings does not, by itself, establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars for penalty purposes. Where the surrender was made to buy peace and avoid further litigation, and the surrounding facts did not justify a concealment penalty, section 271(1)(c) penalty was not sustainable. The cancellation of the penalty by the first appellate authority was therefore upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140453" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 957 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103414</link>
      <description>A surrender of additional income during assessment proceedings does not, by itself, establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars for penalty purposes. Where the surrender was made to buy peace and avoid further litigation, and the surrounding facts did not justify a concealment penalty, section 271(1)(c) penalty was not sustainable. The cancellation of the penalty by the first appellate authority was therefore upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>