<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 457 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103409</link>
    <description>RBI circulars prohibiting buy-back arrangements bind banks as regulatory directions, but breach does not automatically invalidate contracts with third parties who were not addressed by the directions. A ready-forward transaction is severable: the ready leg, being an immediate sale and delivery against payment, remains valid, while any illegality is confined to the forward repurchase commitment. Once the ready leg is performed and title has passed, the completed transfer is not undone by illegality in the forward leg, and the securities cannot be treated as attachable property under the Special Court Act if they no longer belong to the notified persons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140448" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 457 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103409</link>
      <description>RBI circulars prohibiting buy-back arrangements bind banks as regulatory directions, but breach does not automatically invalidate contracts with third parties who were not addressed by the directions. A ready-forward transaction is severable: the ready leg, being an immediate sale and delivery against payment, remains valid, while any illegality is confined to the forward repurchase commitment. Once the ready leg is performed and title has passed, the completed transfer is not undone by illegality in the forward leg, and the securities cannot be treated as attachable property under the Special Court Act if they no longer belong to the notified persons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>