<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 952 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103405</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the penalty under section 271 B for not obtaining the audit report within the specified time was deemed invalid and deleted. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, highlighting that the burden of proof rested with the revenue department to demonstrate any delay in obtaining the report beyond the specified date, which they failed to do.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:56:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 952 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103405</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the penalty under section 271 B for not obtaining the audit report within the specified time was deemed invalid and deleted. The judge ruled in favor of the appellant, highlighting that the burden of proof rested with the revenue department to demonstrate any delay in obtaining the report beyond the specified date, which they failed to do.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>