<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 947 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103400</link>
    <description>The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed. The addition of Rs. 54,840 for low yield and excess shortage was reduced to Rs. 40,000 due to inadequate record-keeping. Specific expenses were partially disallowed, and the addition of Rs. 25,000 as unexplained income was deleted based on supporting documentation. The tribunal made adjustments after detailed analysis of each issue, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:42:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 947 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103400</link>
      <description>The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed. The addition of Rs. 54,840 for low yield and excess shortage was reduced to Rs. 40,000 due to inadequate record-keeping. Specific expenses were partially disallowed, and the addition of Rs. 25,000 as unexplained income was deleted based on supporting documentation. The tribunal made adjustments after detailed analysis of each issue, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>