https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103392 The court upheld the trial judge's decision to admit the company petition and order advertisement, finding that the appellant was unable to pay its debts. The court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the judge had acted within his jurisdiction by allowing further arguments before passing the impugned order. The appellant's reliance on cases involving unsigned orders was rejected, and the court emphasized that a judgment could be altered before signing, provided notice was given to the parties. Consequently, the appeal and related petition were dismissed. en-us Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:26:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103392 The court upheld the trial judge's decision to admit the company petition and order advertisement, finding that the appellant was unable to pay its debts. The court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the judge had acted within his jurisdiction by allowing further arguments before passing the impugned order. The appellant's reliance on cases involving unsigned orders was rejected, and the court emphasized that a judgment could be altered before signing, provided notice was given to the parties. Consequently, the appeal and related petition were dismissed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103392