https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103391 The Commission ruled that the appeal was not time-barred as it was filed within the limitation period based on the date of communication of the order. However, the case involving the sale and purchase of shares was deemed beyond the scope of the Consumer Protection Act due to its complexity and the need for detailed evidence. The Commission clarified its limited jurisdiction compared to a Civil Court and directed the complainant to seek redress in the appropriate legal forum, dismissing the appeal without costs awarded. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:23:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103391 The Commission ruled that the appeal was not time-barred as it was filed within the limitation period based on the date of communication of the order. However, the case involving the sale and purchase of shares was deemed beyond the scope of the Consumer Protection Act due to its complexity and the need for detailed evidence. The Commission clarified its limited jurisdiction compared to a Civil Court and directed the complainant to seek redress in the appropriate legal forum, dismissing the appeal without costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 03 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103391