<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 346 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103385</link>
    <description>Residual oil left after processing groundnut oil with acids and chemicals retained its essential character as groundnut oil for sales tax purposes. The Court treated the residue as the same commodity in substance, despite greater impurities from refining, and held that the processing did not alter its essential nature. It therefore continued to answer the description of groundnut oil and was taxable at the lower rate applicable to that commodity, in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 346 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103385</link>
      <description>Residual oil left after processing groundnut oil with acids and chemicals retained its essential character as groundnut oil for sales tax purposes. The Court treated the residue as the same commodity in substance, despite greater impurities from refining, and held that the processing did not alter its essential nature. It therefore continued to answer the description of groundnut oil and was taxable at the lower rate applicable to that commodity, in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>