<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 417 - SPECIAL COURT (TRIAL OF OFFENCES RELATING TO TRANS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103376</link>
    <description>Stock Exchanges could certify a purchaser as a bona fide purchaser for value only where the purchase was made through a member or through a member&#039;s sub-broker, and the protective clarification was meant to shield such purchasers from attachment and unnecessary court proceedings. That certification could extend to a chain involving more than one sub-broker, but only if each intermediary sub-broker was itself a sub-broker of a member of the Stock Exchanges. If any intermediary was merely a sub-broker of another sub-broker and not of a member, the Stock Exchanges lacked authority to certify and the party had to seek a declaration of title from the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:36:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 417 - SPECIAL COURT (TRIAL OF OFFENCES RELATING TO TRANS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103376</link>
      <description>Stock Exchanges could certify a purchaser as a bona fide purchaser for value only where the purchase was made through a member or through a member&#039;s sub-broker, and the protective clarification was meant to shield such purchasers from attachment and unnecessary court proceedings. That certification could extend to a chain involving more than one sub-broker, but only if each intermediary sub-broker was itself a sub-broker of a member of the Stock Exchanges. If any intermediary was merely a sub-broker of another sub-broker and not of a member, the Stock Exchanges lacked authority to certify and the party had to seek a declaration of title from the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>