https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103374 Pre-process revision against dismissal of a complaint does not require notice to the accused where the complaint has not been taken on file and no process has issued. Defaults under sections 159 and 220 were treated as continuing offences, so the offence did not become complete on the initial date of default and the six-month limitation bar under section 468(2)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was inapplicable. The dismissal orders were set aside and the complaints were remitted for being taken on file and dealt with according to law. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:32:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103374 Pre-process revision against dismissal of a complaint does not require notice to the accused where the complaint has not been taken on file and no process has issued. Defaults under sections 159 and 220 were treated as continuing offences, so the offence did not become complete on the initial date of default and the six-month limitation bar under section 468(2)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was inapplicable. The dismissal orders were set aside and the complaints were remitted for being taken on file and dealt with according to law. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 06 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103374