https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103372 Conviction for unlawful retention of company property was upheld where the petitioner admitted that his right to occupy company quarters ended on resignation and he continued in possession; the statutory prohibition applies to persons who retain company premises after their occupancy right ceases, and criminal liability was sustained. No substantive leniency was afforded because continued occupation prejudiced other entitled employees; however a limited administrative indulgence was granted to permit vacating by a specified date on condition of a filed undertaking, breach of which exposes the occupier to contempt proceedings. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:27:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103372 Conviction for unlawful retention of company property was upheld where the petitioner admitted that his right to occupy company quarters ended on resignation and he continued in possession; the statutory prohibition applies to persons who retain company premises after their occupancy right ceases, and criminal liability was sustained. No substantive leniency was afforded because continued occupation prejudiced other entitled employees; however a limited administrative indulgence was granted to permit vacating by a specified date on condition of a filed undertaking, breach of which exposes the occupier to contempt proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 09 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103372