<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 601 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103362</link>
    <description>Loss from sale of right issue entitlements may be recognised in computing capital gains where the underlying investment is a capital asset and the claimed diminution reflects an actual capital loss rather than a merely notional loss. Applying settled judicial principles on capital gains computation, the appellate authority accepted that the assessee&#039;s claim could not be disallowed on the ground that it was notional. The loss on the sale of the right entitlements was therefore allowable in capital gains computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:08:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 601 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103362</link>
      <description>Loss from sale of right issue entitlements may be recognised in computing capital gains where the underlying investment is a capital asset and the claimed diminution reflects an actual capital loss rather than a merely notional loss. Applying settled judicial principles on capital gains computation, the appellate authority accepted that the assessee&#039;s claim could not be disallowed on the ground that it was notional. The loss on the sale of the right entitlements was therefore allowable in capital gains computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>