<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 600 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103361</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the issues of disallowance of royalty payment, allowance of payment made before the due date, and deletion of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C for the assessment year 1989-90. The Tribunal held that the opening balance amount should not be disallowed and directed the Assessing Officer to verify evidence of payment for the allowed deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:05:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 600 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103361</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant on the issues of disallowance of royalty payment, allowance of payment made before the due date, and deletion of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C for the assessment year 1989-90. The Tribunal held that the opening balance amount should not be disallowed and directed the Assessing Officer to verify evidence of payment for the allowed deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>