<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 571 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103351</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as there was insufficient evidence to prove deliberate concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, especially when the additions were based on estimates without concrete material to support deliberate underestimation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 571 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103351</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c) as there was insufficient evidence to prove deliberate concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income, especially when the additions were based on estimates without concrete material to support deliberate underestimation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>