<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 566 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103347</link>
    <description>Jewellery given as warri to a daughter-in-law on a son&#039;s marriage was treated as marriage expenditure arising from a recognised Hindu social and customary obligation. Because the transfer was made in discharge of that obligation and not as a voluntary transfer without consideration, it did not fall within the statutory concept of a gift under the Gift-tax Act. On that reasoning, the jewellery was not taxable as a gift and the addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:40:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 566 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103347</link>
      <description>Jewellery given as warri to a daughter-in-law on a son&#039;s marriage was treated as marriage expenditure arising from a recognised Hindu social and customary obligation. Because the transfer was made in discharge of that obligation and not as a voluntary transfer without consideration, it did not fall within the statutory concept of a gift under the Gift-tax Act. On that reasoning, the jewellery was not taxable as a gift and the addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>