https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103336 The Andhra Pradesh High Court in 1996 dismissed a writ petition where a company incorporated in December 1993 sought directions for another company incorporated in September 1994 to change its name due to similarities. The Court held that since objections were not raised within the prescribed time limit under the Companies Act, the petitioner was not entitled to relief. It emphasized that statutory limitations cannot be extended through writs of mandamus, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent company. en-us Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:26:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103336 The Andhra Pradesh High Court in 1996 dismissed a writ petition where a company incorporated in December 1993 sought directions for another company incorporated in September 1994 to change its name due to similarities. The Court held that since objections were not raised within the prescribed time limit under the Companies Act, the petitioner was not entitled to relief. It emphasized that statutory limitations cannot be extended through writs of mandamus, ultimately ruling in favor of the respondent company. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 18 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103336