https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103331 Jurisdiction to challenge forfeiture of shares lay in ordinary civil proceedings because no provision of the Companies Act conferred Company Court jurisdiction over the relief sought. The power to forfeit shares arose from the articles of association, and the statutory scheme on rectification of the register did not apply on the facts. Where a statute creates a right but does not provide a special forum or enforcement mode, ordinary civil jurisdiction remains available. Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 could not be used to expand jurisdiction by invoking inherent powers. The company petition was therefore not maintainable before the Company Court. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 14:16:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103331 Jurisdiction to challenge forfeiture of shares lay in ordinary civil proceedings because no provision of the Companies Act conferred Company Court jurisdiction over the relief sought. The power to forfeit shares arose from the articles of association, and the statutory scheme on rectification of the register did not apply on the facts. Where a statute creates a right but does not provide a special forum or enforcement mode, ordinary civil jurisdiction remains available. Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 could not be used to expand jurisdiction by invoking inherent powers. The company petition was therefore not maintainable before the Company Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 20 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103331