<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (7) TMI 461 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103325</link>
    <description>The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act operates as a self-contained enforcement code, so investigative powers under the general criminal procedure cannot be used to confer competence on Delhi Special Police Establishment officers unless that statute expressly authorises them. No notification under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was shown authorising such officers to act as enforcement officers, and offences alleged to have been committed outside India could not be investigated without the Central Government&#039;s permission. The refusal to permit investigation was therefore upheld, and the officers were held not competent to investigate in the manner sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (7) TMI 461 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103325</link>
      <description>The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act operates as a self-contained enforcement code, so investigative powers under the general criminal procedure cannot be used to confer competence on Delhi Special Police Establishment officers unless that statute expressly authorises them. No notification under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act was shown authorising such officers to act as enforcement officers, and offences alleged to have been committed outside India could not be investigated without the Central Government&#039;s permission. The refusal to permit investigation was therefore upheld, and the officers were held not competent to investigate in the manner sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103325</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>