<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 416 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the addition on account of stock discrepancies but upheld the disallowance under section 40A(3) for cash payments. The levy of interest was deemed consequential in nature, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow consequential reliefs to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:28:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 416 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the addition on account of stock discrepancies but upheld the disallowance under section 40A(3) for cash payments. The levy of interest was deemed consequential in nature, and the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to allow consequential reliefs to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>