<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 410 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103310</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 273(1)(b) was held unsustainable because the obligation to file an advance-tax statement arises only where advance tax is actually payable. On the due date, the assessee had no assessable income giving rise to advance-tax liability, as the earlier assessed income was negative. Since the statutory precondition for filing the statement was absent, penalty could not be levied and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:13:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 410 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103310</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 273(1)(b) was held unsustainable because the obligation to file an advance-tax statement arises only where advance tax is actually payable. On the due date, the assessee had no assessable income giving rise to advance-tax liability, as the earlier assessed income was negative. Since the statutory precondition for filing the statement was absent, penalty could not be levied and was deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>