<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103309</link>
    <description>Winding-up for inability to pay debts depends on whether the debtor raises a genuine and bona fide dispute over an admitted liability. Technical objections, delayed responses and unsupported denials do not displace evidence of inter-corporate deposits and confirming correspondence. A continuing loan arrangement may remain within limitation where later pleadings merely clarify the originally disclosed transaction rather than introduce a new cause of action. Alleged share or collateral security must have realisable value and be validly created; ineffective security does not defeat maintainability. Compliance with the prescribed affidavit requirements supports admission of the petition. On these principles, winding up was ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:10:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103309</link>
      <description>Winding-up for inability to pay debts depends on whether the debtor raises a genuine and bona fide dispute over an admitted liability. Technical objections, delayed responses and unsupported denials do not displace evidence of inter-corporate deposits and confirming correspondence. A continuing loan arrangement may remain within limitation where later pleadings merely clarify the originally disclosed transaction rather than introduce a new cause of action. Alleged share or collateral security must have realisable value and be validly created; ineffective security does not defeat maintainability. Compliance with the prescribed affidavit requirements supports admission of the petition. On these principles, winding up was ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>