<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (2) TMI 392 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103300</link>
    <description>A retracted confessional statement must be closely scrutinised before it can support penalty or confiscation. Where the statement was withdrawn the next day and the retraction was backed by allegations of coercion, detention and injuries, together with hospital records, and where the recording officer was not examined and no independent corroboration was produced, the statement could not safely be treated as voluntary or true. The fact that it contained details said to be within the appellant&#039;s special knowledge did not, by itself, make it reliable. On that basis, the penalty and confiscation orders could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:48:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (2) TMI 392 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103300</link>
      <description>A retracted confessional statement must be closely scrutinised before it can support penalty or confiscation. Where the statement was withdrawn the next day and the retraction was backed by allegations of coercion, detention and injuries, together with hospital records, and where the recording officer was not examined and no independent corroboration was produced, the statement could not safely be treated as voluntary or true. The fact that it contained details said to be within the appellant&#039;s special knowledge did not, by itself, make it reliable. On that basis, the penalty and confiscation orders could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>