<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 269 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103294</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Company Court&#039;s jurisdiction to review its orders and dismissed technical objections regarding the review application. The finality of the first order dated 24-10-1979 was not accepted due to a directive for fresh consideration. A miscalculation of shareholding percentages led to a review, acknowledging the error and directing a fresh consideration. Subsequent events impacting shareholding dynamics were considered, leading to the suspension of share transfers. The Court issued specific directions for company management, emphasizing the interests of the Jain Group. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:28:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 269 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103294</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Company Court&#039;s jurisdiction to review its orders and dismissed technical objections regarding the review application. The finality of the first order dated 24-10-1979 was not accepted due to a directive for fresh consideration. A miscalculation of shareholding percentages led to a review, acknowledging the error and directing a fresh consideration. Subsequent events impacting shareholding dynamics were considered, leading to the suspension of share transfers. The Court issued specific directions for company management, emphasizing the interests of the Jain Group. The appeal was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>