<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (11) TMI 287 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103293</link>
    <description>In an f.o.r. Jodhpur sale contract, property in the tents and the transit risk passed to the buyer when the goods were loaded into railway wagons for dispatch, because delivery to the carrier without reservation completed unconditional appropriation to the contract. The buyer was therefore liable for the price of the short-delivered quantity. The note also states that, where the unpaid sale price remained withheld for a substantial period and no contrary stipulation existed, reasonable interest could be awarded from the date the amount became payable. Interest on the unpaid price was allowed at 6 per cent per annum for the relevant period, together with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (11) TMI 287 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103293</link>
      <description>In an f.o.r. Jodhpur sale contract, property in the tents and the transit risk passed to the buyer when the goods were loaded into railway wagons for dispatch, because delivery to the carrier without reservation completed unconditional appropriation to the contract. The buyer was therefore liable for the price of the short-delivered quantity. The note also states that, where the unpaid sale price remained withheld for a substantial period and no contrary stipulation existed, reasonable interest could be awarded from the date the amount became payable. Interest on the unpaid price was allowed at 6 per cent per annum for the relevant period, together with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>