https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103286 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 1,65,822 for alleged sale of tooth powder but rejected the double addition by the Assessing Officer for suppressed sales and excess stocks. The Tribunal also ruled against charging interest under section 234B due to lack of a speaking order. Both the assessee's and revenue's appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal basing its decision on detailed analysis and legal precedents. en-us Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:20:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103286 The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 1,65,822 for alleged sale of tooth powder but rejected the double addition by the Assessing Officer for suppressed sales and excess stocks. The Tribunal also ruled against charging interest under section 234B due to lack of a speaking order. Both the assessee's and revenue's appeals were partly allowed, with the Tribunal basing its decision on detailed analysis and legal precedents. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 29 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103286