<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 265 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103285</link>
    <description>The court revoked a winding up order issued in 1986 against a financially troubled company and approved a revival scheme proposed by T. S. Rai and Associates, supported by shareholders and secured creditors. An interim stay was granted on alienating assets, and the court emphasized the scheme&#039;s feasibility, viability, and bona fides. Despite some unsecured creditors&#039; opposition, the court found the scheme just and reasonable, prioritizing public interest, creditor&#039;s rights, and the company&#039;s rehabilitation. Labor welfare, non-resident Indian investments, and creditor support were considered, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation benefiting all stakeholders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:17:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 265 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103285</link>
      <description>The court revoked a winding up order issued in 1986 against a financially troubled company and approved a revival scheme proposed by T. S. Rai and Associates, supported by shareholders and secured creditors. An interim stay was granted on alienating assets, and the court emphasized the scheme&#039;s feasibility, viability, and bona fides. Despite some unsecured creditors&#039; opposition, the court found the scheme just and reasonable, prioritizing public interest, creditor&#039;s rights, and the company&#039;s rehabilitation. Labor welfare, non-resident Indian investments, and creditor support were considered, ensuring a comprehensive evaluation benefiting all stakeholders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>