https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103273 Territorial jurisdiction under Section 20 CPC for a corporation depends on where the cause of action arises in relation to its subordinate office, not merely on the location of its principal office. Applying Patel Roadways, the Delhi High Court noted that where the corporation has a subordinate office and all material acts, including contract execution, payment, and related performance, occurred at Korba, no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi. Jurisdiction therefore lay only with the court connected to Korba, and filing the arbitral award in Delhi was not maintainable. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:30:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103273 Territorial jurisdiction under Section 20 CPC for a corporation depends on where the cause of action arises in relation to its subordinate office, not merely on the location of its principal office. Applying Patel Roadways, the Delhi High Court noted that where the corporation has a subordinate office and all material acts, including contract execution, payment, and related performance, occurred at Korba, no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi. Jurisdiction therefore lay only with the court connected to Korba, and filing the arbitral award in Delhi was not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103273