https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103267 The court upheld the validity and enforceability of the Division Bench's judgment, dismissing objections raised by respondents Nos. 1 and 2. It ruled that the decree could not be challenged on jurisdictional grounds at the execution stage, as the Supreme Court had conclusively decided on the matter. The appointment of a receiver to manage the company's affairs was affirmed, with respondents directed to comply with court orders. en-us Thu, 20 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:48:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103267 The court upheld the validity and enforceability of the Division Bench's judgment, dismissing objections raised by respondents Nos. 1 and 2. It ruled that the decree could not be challenged on jurisdictional grounds at the execution stage, as the Supreme Court had conclusively decided on the matter. The appointment of a receiver to manage the company's affairs was affirmed, with respondents directed to comply with court orders. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103267