https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103265 Employees of a company in liquidation could not claim higher pay scale, allowances, or regularisation in the bank's service because they were never appointed by the bank and had no employment relationship with it. The principle of equal pay for equal work did not apply in the absence of parity in employment status, and payments made through the official liquidator were only advances for watch and ward charges and salary, recoverable from the company's assets. The writ petition was dismissed because no legal right to the claimed service benefits was established. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:44:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103265 Employees of a company in liquidation could not claim higher pay scale, allowances, or regularisation in the bank's service because they were never appointed by the bank and had no employment relationship with it. The principle of equal pay for equal work did not apply in the absence of parity in employment status, and payments made through the official liquidator were only advances for watch and ward charges and salary, recoverable from the company's assets. The writ petition was dismissed because no legal right to the claimed service benefits was established. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103265