https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103264 Interim injunctive relief against an extraordinary general meeting was considered inappropriate where proposed amendments to the articles concerned corporate management structure and functioning, including quorum, delegation of powers and deletion of provisions. Prior arrangements did not justify preventing shareholder decision-making, and expiry of a valuation timetable did not invalidate the proposed corporate action. The amendments were not treated as dispossessing shareholders of their holdings or existing offices. No fresh notice was required following adjournment because Table A was excluded by the company's articles. The shareholder meeting remained the proper forum to decide the amendments, and the injunction application failed. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103264 Interim injunctive relief against an extraordinary general meeting was considered inappropriate where proposed amendments to the articles concerned corporate management structure and functioning, including quorum, delegation of powers and deletion of provisions. Prior arrangements did not justify preventing shareholder decision-making, and expiry of a valuation timetable did not invalidate the proposed corporate action. The amendments were not treated as dispossessing shareholders of their holdings or existing offices. No fresh notice was required following adjournment because Table A was excluded by the company's articles. The shareholder meeting remained the proper forum to decide the amendments, and the injunction application failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103264