https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103264 An interim injunction was sought to restrain an extraordinary general meeting from considering amendments to the articles of association, including quorum, delegation of powers and deletion of articles. The Delhi High Court article notes that the memorandum of understanding did not, on the facts, justify blocking the shareholder process, and the expiry of the valuation timetable did not prevent the proposed corporate action. The amendments were treated as matters of management structure and functioning, not as measures to dispossess the plaintiffs of shareholding or offices. The objection regarding absence of fresh notice after adjournment also failed because Table A did not apply under the company's articles, and the injunction was therefore not warranted. en-us Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:44:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103264 An interim injunction was sought to restrain an extraordinary general meeting from considering amendments to the articles of association, including quorum, delegation of powers and deletion of articles. The Delhi High Court article notes that the memorandum of understanding did not, on the facts, justify blocking the shareholder process, and the expiry of the valuation timetable did not prevent the proposed corporate action. The amendments were treated as matters of management structure and functioning, not as measures to dispossess the plaintiffs of shareholding or offices. The objection regarding absence of fresh notice after adjournment also failed because Table A did not apply under the company's articles, and the injunction was therefore not warranted. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 18 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103264