https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103262 Arbitration under Bombay Stock Exchange bye-laws was treated as continuing within the exchange framework despite the expiry of the original award period, because the bye-laws allowed extension of time by the governing body or President and section 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 did not apply. The consent order did not displace the exchange regime, and substitution of a resigned arbitrator was valid under that framework. Deemed contract and arbitration provisions in bye-law 226 applied to securities dealings even without contract notes and despite the petitioner's non-member status during the relevant period, so the disputes remained arbitrable. en-us Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:16:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103262 Arbitration under Bombay Stock Exchange bye-laws was treated as continuing within the exchange framework despite the expiry of the original award period, because the bye-laws allowed extension of time by the governing body or President and section 37 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 did not apply. The consent order did not displace the exchange regime, and substitution of a resigned arbitrator was valid under that framework. Deemed contract and arbitration provisions in bye-law 226 applied to securities dealings even without contract notes and despite the petitioner's non-member status during the relevant period, so the disputes remained arbitrable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103262