<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 386 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103251</link>
    <description>The court convicted one of the accused individuals under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 for failing to file the statement of affairs after a winding-up order. A fine of Rs. 2,500 was imposed, with a seven-day simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court emphasized the importance of complying with statutory obligations and upheld the integrity of the winding-up process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:50:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 386 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103251</link>
      <description>The court convicted one of the accused individuals under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 1956 for failing to file the statement of affairs after a winding-up order. A fine of Rs. 2,500 was imposed, with a seven-day simple imprisonment in default of payment. The court emphasized the importance of complying with statutory obligations and upheld the integrity of the winding-up process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>