<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 384 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103249</link>
    <description>The Commission held that the complainant was entitled to interest on debentures under the Consumer Protection Act, as debentures constitute a service, and failure to pay interest amounts to a deficiency in service. However, the complainant was not entitled to a refund after debentures were converted into shares. Additionally, the failure to pay dividends on shares was not considered a deficiency in service. The Commission partly allowed the appeal, directing the appellant to pay interest on debentures and advising the complainant to seek legal remedy for non-payment of dividends on shares within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:44:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=140289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 384 - DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103249</link>
      <description>The Commission held that the complainant was entitled to interest on debentures under the Consumer Protection Act, as debentures constitute a service, and failure to pay interest amounts to a deficiency in service. However, the complainant was not entitled to a refund after debentures were converted into shares. Additionally, the failure to pay dividends on shares was not considered a deficiency in service. The Commission partly allowed the appeal, directing the appellant to pay interest on debentures and advising the complainant to seek legal remedy for non-payment of dividends on shares within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=103249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>